{"id":2468,"date":"2026-01-23T12:17:29","date_gmt":"2026-01-23T18:17:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/iowappa.com\/?p=2468"},"modified":"2026-01-23T12:17:29","modified_gmt":"2026-01-23T18:17:29","slug":"what-are-you-afraid-of","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/iowappa.com\/?p=2468","title":{"rendered":"What are you afraid of?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/iowappa.com\/?attachment_id=111\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-111\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-111\" src=\"https:\/\/iowappa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/webeagle1-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/iowappa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/webeagle1-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/iowappa.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/webeagle1.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/a>As technology advances, law enforcement agencies seek innovative methods of utilizing newfound technology in the name of public safety. However, any legislative proposal that would change public access to the information acquired through those methods are met with strong opposition.<\/p>\n<p>Twenty years ago, \u201cIn dicta from an Iowa Supreme Court decision from 2006, <a href=\"https:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=7400750088923681836&amp;q=custodial+interrogation&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=4,16\">State v. Hajtic<\/a>, the late Justice Jerry Larson (father of current Chief Justice Susan Christensen), speaking for a unanimous Court stated: \u2018We believe electronic recording, particularly videotaping, of custodial interrogations should be encouraged, and we take this opportunity to do so.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMost jurisdictions in the United States now record interrogations, including all federal law enforcement agencies, thirty states, and the District of Columbia.\u201d\u00a0 But not Iowa. The time for change is in 2026.<\/p>\n<p>The Iowa Bar Association met with many stakeholders in 2009 to discuss the issue of electronically-recorded custodial interrogations. Although most stakeholders \u201csupport recording in principle,\u201d concerns about the cost of implementation were expressed by several participants. Today, cost is no longer a legitimate concern.<\/p>\n<p>A former legislator once explained Moore\u2019s Law to me. \u201cMoore&#8217;s Law is the observation that the number of transistors on a microchip doubles approximately every two years, leading to increased computing power and decreased costs.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>I recently purchased a mini action dash camera from Menards for only $6.99 plus tax. The camera is not only a windshield mount, but has a clothing clip so that I may wear it like a police officer\u2019s bodycam. It has a high-resolution HD 1080p video with 8 GB card. It comes with audio and has 90 minutes of rechargeable battery life. Also, I get an 11% rebate.<\/p>\n<p>Not only is the cost of recording equipment decreasing, but practically every law enforcement officer in Iowa wears a bodycam. Currently, Iowa has no law regulating the use of body cameras on law enforcement officers. According to a 2025 article by the Iowa Newspaper Association, \u201cErin Jordan, of The (Cedar Rapids) Gazette, and Jared Strong, of the Carroll Times Herald, found many of the [local] policies were outdated \u2013 some still mentioned videotape \u2013 and inconsistent. About half did not acknowledge police video as a public record.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>A legislative measure that sets minimum standards for body cameras should be enacted, and it should include the use of bodycams in interviewing suspects in custody. Fancy equipment used by Hollywood directors is not necessary.<\/p>\n<p>Randy Evans, executive director at Iowa of Freedom of Information Council, contends that \u201cpolice videos regularly are deemed to be open public records.\u201d That could be a factor in the fear that law enforcement, county attorneys and the Iowa Attorney General express in their opposition to supporting the recordings. \u201cWhat do you have to fear\u201d is a mantra that goes both ways.<\/p>\n<p>Iowa Code section 22.7, subsection 5 is an exception to the Open Records law in which \u201cofficers\u2019 investigative reports\u201d and privileged records are exempt from public disclosure \u201cif that information is part of an <strong>ongoing investigation.<\/strong>\u201d At the present time, it appears as though investigations in Iowa seem to never cease. Language that makes custodial recordings accessible to defense attorneys should be a requirement for any legislative proposal.<\/p>\n<p>Attempts in the past to amend section 5 of Chapter 22 have been met with strong resistance by a concerted effort of lobbyists representing police, sheriffs, and other agencies such as the Iowa Department of Public Safety and the Iowa Attorney General. For them, opposing any legislation changing the <em>status quo<\/em> is an affront to their ongoing need to be in control.<\/p>\n<p>The last time a bill was considered that required the video and audio recording of custodial interrogations (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.legis.iowa.gov\/legislation\/BillBook?ga=85&amp;ba=hsb572\">House Study Bill 572<\/a> in 2014), the bill was intended to be a compromise between advocates and opponents. Unfortunately, the powerful law enforcement community persuaded lawmakers that the bill was a \u201csolution looking for a problem.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This year, House Republicans are preparing to prioritize a package they label \u201ctough on crime.\u201d Yet, due process does not seem to be a part of their parcel. Including a provision on requiring the video and audio taping of custodial interviews should be seen as a necessary constitutional safeguard.<\/p>\n<p>Government employees, local, state, or federal, have added protection in the form of the federal Bill of Rights.\u00a0 A government employee is provided due process of law, the right to confront witnesses, and all the other protections usually offered to criminal defendants.\u00a0 What you may not know, is that in Iowa, anyone with a law enforcement certification is provided with an additional set of protections, such as an \u201cinterview of an officer who is the subject of the complaint shall, at a minimum, be audio recorded.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0The \u201cOfficer\u2019s Bill of Rights,\u201d which is embedded in section\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.legis.iowa.gov\/docs\/code\/2020\/80F.pdf\">80F.1<\/a>\u00a0of the Iowa Code, should extend to all Iowans.<\/p>\n<p>This article was previously published in the <a href=\"https:\/\/theprairieprogressive.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/2026-01-prairie-progressive.pdf\">Prairie Progressive, January 2026<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">***<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Please help Fawkes-Lee &amp; Ryan maintain this website by donating $10, $20, $30, $50, $100, or more.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.paypal.com\/donate\/?business=Y8DP2NU226YME&amp;no_recurring=0&amp;item_name=Help+Fawkes-Lee+%26+Ryan+continue+to+post+blogs+and+other+information+by+supporting+us+with+a+donation.&amp;currency_code=USD\">Donate<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Your support is appreciated.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Subscribe (It\u2019s FREE): Email\u00a0mrtyryn@gmail.com\u00a0with \u201cSubscribe\u201d in the Subject Line.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Fawkes-Lee &amp; Ryan<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>2516 Lynner Dr.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Des Moines, IA 50310<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Copyright (c) 2026. Fawkes-Lee &amp; Ryan. All rights reserved.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As technology advances, law enforcement agencies seek innovative methods of utilizing newfound technology in the name of public safety. However, any legislative proposal that would change public access to the information acquired through those methods are met with strong opposition. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/iowappa.com\/?p=2468\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[42],"tags":[1359,1361,1364,1365,1362,1360,1363,1358],"class_list":["post-2468","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-criminal-justice","tag-associate-justice-jerry-larson","tag-erin-jordan","tag-iowa-code-section-22-7","tag-iowa-code-section-80f-1","tag-jared-strong","tag-moores-law","tag-randy-evans","tag-state-v-haitic"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/iowappa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2468","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/iowappa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/iowappa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iowappa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iowappa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2468"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/iowappa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2468\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2469,"href":"https:\/\/iowappa.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2468\/revisions\/2469"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/iowappa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iowappa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iowappa.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}